This is a decision about default judgment between crossclaiming defendants.
Watts v. Bowman, 2016 ONSC 3994
Watts is an illustrative case dealing with implied consent. Watts restates the current test for whether implied consent has been granted.
Thompson v. Intact Insurance Company, 2016 CanLII 60729 (ON LAT)
Released August 16, 2016 | Full Decision [CanLII] This is one of the first AABS decisions from the LAT. The applicant brought an AABS application to determine entitlement to a denied treatment plan. Prior to the hearing, Intact agreed to fund the treatment plan. Despite the settlement, the applicant sought to recoup its costs of preparing for the hearing. The LAT was forced to decide …
Gilbert v. South, 2015 ONCA 712
Court of Appeal Refuses to Order Trust or Assignment of Accident Benefits Following Trial