The Superior Court holds that evidence concerning post-accident loans taken by the Plaintiff to pay medical, rehabilitation, or other expenses of any kind is NOT admissible since those losses are too remote, not reasonably foreseeable to the Defendants at the time of the accident, and therefore, not recoverable as damages.

Full Decision Counsel for the Appellant Linda Sue Pearce:         Jeffrey R. LeRoyCounsel for the Respondent Shayne Berwick:        Brian Cameron Counsel for the Respondent The Personal:       Louis Covens Counsel for the Respondent Ruo Hang Liu:     Luke Hamer Heard by:                                                           Justice David H. Doherty                                                                             Justice Janet M. Simmons                                                                             Justice Gladys I. Pardu This was an appeal from the Order of Justice Phillip …

Court finds that the limitation period in a minor’s claim runs from the date a litigation guardian is appointed and not when the litigation guardian’s identity is declared in a notice letter.

Full Decision Counsel for the Applicant:                               Gregory Gilhooly Counsel for the Respondent State Farm:       Todd McCarthy Counsel for the Respondent FSCO:                  Martina Aswani Heard by:                                                             Justice Julie A. Thorburn Justice Katherine E. Swinton Justice Jill M. Copeland Justice Jill M. Copeland This was a judicial review of the decision of Director’s Delegate Evans with respect to an entitlement to Income Replacement Benefits. The …

Jury’s answer on causation insufficient according to Justice Wilson. New trial ordered.

Lawyers are permitted to write expert reports (and/or expert’s affidavits) for their litigation experts without piercing litigation privilege.