Review of the law on the interpretation of exclusion clauses.
Case Summaries Category Archives
Davis v. Aviva Canada Inc, 2017 ONSC 6173
Injuries sustained while maintaining vehicle may be an “accident” within the meaning of the SABS.
Jamieson v. Kapashesit et al, 2017 ONSC 5784 (CanLII)
Adverse costs insurance policies need not be produced in their entirety where the insured is the law firm and not the plaintiffs. To require disclosure would require a breach of the solicitor-client privilege of other clients covered under the policy.
Perth Insurance Company v. Salim Surani, 2017 CarswellOnt 13620 (FSCO Appeal Decision)
Pursuant to s. 7(3)(b) of the SABS, post-accident business income is deductible from the claimant’s IRBs.
Middleton v. Pankhurst, 2017 ONCA 835 (CanLII)
The Court of Appeal affirmed that the term “authorized by law” applies only to licencing and restrictions imposed by the Ministry of Transportation. A driver who operates a vehicle with alcohol in his system, in breach of his probation order, is not in violation of statutory conditions.
16-001683 v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
The LAT held that the golf cart is not an “automobile” because the subject accident did not take place on a “common and public driveway”. As such, the applicant was prohibited from launching an accident benefits claim.