In Security National Insurance Co v. Thomas, the insurer paid income replacement benefits to the insured, Aklilu Thomas, following a collision that occurred on June 1, 2018. Partial repayment of benefits was subsequently sought by the insurer and the dispute went to the Licence Appeal Tribunal (the “LAT”).
Robinson v. AIG Insurance involves an appeal and judicial review before the Divisional Court, regarding a decision made by the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT).
A Reconsideration Decision, in which the applicant requested for the Initial Decision to be set aside, and for a new hearing before a different adjudicator
This decision relates to a summary judgment motion, brought by the defendant. Justice Braid notes that if the matter is to be resolved by way of summary judgment
Mandel v. Fakhim[1] involves an appeal from a trial decision, heard before the Divisional Court. The action related to injuries resulting from a motor vehicle collision, which occurred on July 4, 2009. The jury verdict at trial was delivered on November 18, 2016, where the jury awarded $3,000 in damages to the plaintiff, for pain and suffering, and nothing for past or future lost income, future care expenses or housekeeping services.
This Reconsideration Decision involves the issue of whether the applicant can receive both the Canada Recovery Benefit (“CRB”) and the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (“CERB”) and Income Replacement Benefits IRBs.
