Ms. Shuttleworth’s counsel received an anonymous letter claiming that before the decision was released, it was reviewed and changed by the executive chair of SLASTO.

The Plaintiff, Gennett Lumber Company, brought a motion for default judgment against a defendant who was a participant in a complex fraudulent scheme.

The appellant argued that the requested amendments to the statement of claim should not be allowed because they constitute a new statutory cause of action and are sought after the applicable two-year limitation period had expired.

Legal fees incurred in obtaining a guardianship order for persons deemed catastrophically impaired may or may not be considered “rehabilitative benefits”.

This decision arises after the Defendant brought a motion for summary judgment seeking the dismissal of the Plaintiff’s action as a result of a motor vehicle accident on August 7, 2013.

The Defendants succeeded on a motion for an order requiring that the Plaintiffs appoint an appraiser pursuant to s. 128(5) of the Insurance Act.