Superior Court Judge invalidates waiver on the basis of violation of the Consumer Protection Act

This was a motion and cross-motion for summary judgment. The defendant driver sought to have the claim dismissed as against him and his numbered company. The Plaintiff’s insurer sought its release from the action under its unidentified coverage. In the alternative, it sought a ruling that the OPCF 44R was not triggered in the circumstances of this claim.

This was a motion by the Plaintiff to compel productions and attendance at examinations for discovery of an insurance broker after the matter had been set down for trial in which conflicting authorities were reviewed.

Municipality found partially liable for motor vehicle accident resulting in quadriplegia

This summary judgement motion concerned issues of witness credibility and the evidentiary requirements of proving entitlement to the OPCF-44R Family Protection Endorsement

An unsuccessful motion to add defendants more than 4 years after the incident with helpful comments about reasonable due diligence.