The Plaintiffs brought a motion to strike the jury notice after their ten-week trial was adjourned indefinitely as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Guest Author
Higashi v. Chiarot et al. – Court File No: 14-61439
In this case, the Plaintiff brought a motion to strike the jury after her four-week trial.
Robertson v. Bouclair (2019)
The Defendant brought a Motion in this product liability case seeking to commence a Third-Party Claim against the manufacturer nearly two years after the Statement of Claim was issued.
Rufai v. Unifund, 2020, 18-012427/AABS
The respondent brought a motion to quash the summons and change the format of the LAT hearing. The tribunal denied the motion to quash the summons and ordered the hearing to proceed in-person with attendance of the adjuster to be examined on the claim of Special Award.
Arconti v. Smith 2020 ONSC 2782
The Legal Landscape Is Changing; Examination For Discovery Ordered To Proceed By Way Of Videoconference.
Rumsam v. Pakes, [2019] ONCA 748
A plaintiff is obliged to exercise reasonable diligence to secure the name of a doctor who may have participated in negligent care to satisfy the requirements of the Limitations Act.
