Insurers’ mere boilerplate reasons for denying treatment will no longer suffice in light of this Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) decision, which was upheld on appeal.
Anjum v. Doe, 2018 ONSC 4344
When a solicitor is discharged by the client, the solicitor is entitled to a charging order where the property was preserved or recovered while he or she was acting on the client’s behalf…
Nemchin v. Green 2019 ONCA 634
This recent appeal decision provides further guidance on the use of surveillance and Facebook posts since the seminal case of Iannarella v. Corbett, [2015] ONCA 110, which dealt primarily with disclosure obligations associated with surveillance on which a party later intended to rely.
Shuttleworth v. Ontario (Safety, Licensing Appeals and Standards Tribunals) 2019 ONCA 518
Ms. Shuttleworth’s counsel received an anonymous letter claiming that before the decision was released, it was reviewed and changed by the executive chair of SLASTO.
[The Applicant] by his Guardian, K. R. v. Unifund Assurance Company, 2019 CarswellOnt 7818
Legal fees incurred in obtaining a guardianship order for persons deemed catastrophically impaired may or may not be considered “rehabilitative benefits”.
L.L. and Intact Insurance Co., Re, 2019 CarswellOnt 3604
A chain of events triggered by an accident and followed by an assault falls under the definition of “accident” under the SABS according to the latest LAT decision.