In Denman v. Radovanovic, the Ontario Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the trial judge’s decision to find all three defendant physicians liable for failing to obtain Mr. Denman’s informed consent to an elective and multi-step plan of medical intervention to cure Mr. Denman’s brain arteriovenous malformation (“AVM”). This summary will focus on five key takeaways from the Court of Appeal’s decision, written by Rouleau J.A.
Case Summaries Category Archives
J.E. and S.E. v. Metrolinx, 2024 ONSC 612
In November 2017, J.E. was walking on a sidewalk in Waterloo when he was injured by a bus stop sign that was protruding into his path. He claimed damages for injuries including concussion, depression and anxiety. In 2023, J.E. was subsequently hospitalized, diagnosed with and treated for schizophrenia.
Lyng v. Ontario Place Corporation, 2024 ONCA 23
Court of Appeal Upholds Liability in Complicated Causation Occupiers’ Liability Case
Willick v. Willard, 2023 ONCA 792
This action arose from a 2014 fatality of a 51-year-old man following a splenic rupture. The plaintiffs were the spouse and sons of a patient who was cleared to return to work in rural Ontario after having been admitted to hospital for abdominal trauma, including a broken rib, from falling at home while doing renovations. The defendants at trial were the general surgeon who saw the patient in hospital and the family physician who saw the patient in follow-up after he was discharged. The patient died of a splenic rupture 14 days after the fall that brought him into the hospital.
Security National Insurance Co v. Thomas, 2024 CanLII 2673 (ON LAT)
In Security National Insurance Co v. Thomas, the insurer paid income replacement benefits to the insured, Aklilu Thomas, following a collision that occurred on June 1, 2018. Partial repayment of benefits was subsequently sought by the insurer and the dispute went to the Licence Appeal Tribunal (the “LAT”).
Mohammed v. Economical Insurance Company, 2024 CanLII 123 (ON LAT)
In a recent decision, the Licence Appeal Tribunal (the “LAT”) held that the applicant’s concussion removed him from the Minor Injury Guideline (the “MIG”) despite the effective resolution of his concussion symptoms.