The applicant in this case, DC, was involved in a motor vehicle collision on September 20, 2019. DC was 12 years old at the time. As a result of the collision, DC suffered a traumatic brain injury resulting in catastrophic impairment. The dispute before the LAT was whether the respondent, TD Insurance Meloche Monnex, was required to pay DC a non-earner benefit. At the time of the LAT hearing, DC was 15 years old.
SABS Tag Archives
Kellerman-Bernard v. Unica Insurance Company, 2023 ONSC 4423
n Kellerman-Bernard v. Unica, the Ontario Divisional Court held that a parent who suffered psychological injuries as a result of her son’s bicycle collision was entitled to apply for catastrophic designation
Nichols v. Gore Mutual Insurance Company, 2023 CanLII 7299 (ON LAT)
The LAT reversed its decision which would have barred the applicant from proceeding with a claim for benefits.
So What Does “Medical And Any Other Reasons” Really Mean?
Full Decision In Varriano v. Allstate Insurance Company of Canada, the Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) addressed whether a medical reason must be included in every denial of statutory accident benefits. The applicant, Nunzio Varriano, was injured in a motor vehicle collision in September 2015. He successfully applied to his auto insurer, Allstate, for income replacement benefits (IRBs). He returned to work two months later, …
Madore v. Intact Insurance Company 2023 ONSC 11
This matter is related to an appeal brought before the Divisional Court regarding a Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) decision denying Mr. Madore eligibility for benefits under the SABS
Zeledon (20-006269) v. Aviva Insurance Company, 2022 CanLII 124642 (ON LAT)
In this case, a formal diagnosis of chronic pain was not required for removal from the MIG.
