Full Decision Background: The plaintiff, Ms. Sheikhbaghermohajer, was injured in a rear-end collision on October 6, 2014. At the conclusion of trial and accounting for the appropriate deductions and pre-judgment interest, the plaintiff was awarded a total of $469,774.85. The plaintiff sought her legal fees on a partial indemnity basis which was $401,560.23 plus HST. She sought her disbursements which were $139,334.26 plus HST. The …
Full Decision This case reinforces the stringent threshold for dismissing a claim via a summary judgment motion, emphasizing that the Court rigorously evaluates whether there is a genuine issue warranting a trial based on the strength of the evidence presented in the motion materials. Particularly in cases involving unidentified drivers, this decision highlights the critical role of medical evidence in successfully contesting a motion for …
Full Decision On November 21, 2023, the plaintiffs brought a motion for an order striking the statement of defence due to the defendant’s failure to serve a sworn and complete affidavit of documents and to attend examination for discovery. Alternatively, the plaintiffs sought an order compelling the delivery of the affidavit of documents and the defendant’s attendance for examination. The defendant brought a cross-motion for …
In this long-term disability matter H.C., Justice Doyle ruled that the plaintiff was not required to produce the redacted notes and records of her long-time treating psychologist. The Court also granted the plaintiff’s cross-motion for anonymization of the parties’ names as well as a sealing order of the psychologist’s treating records. The case sets out the general principles on redactions of records as well as the Wigmore criteria, and that such redactions be allowed if the information is not relevant to the matter and there is no good reason to produce it.
In November 2017, J.E. was walking on a sidewalk in Waterloo when he was injured by a bus stop sign that was protruding into his path. He claimed damages for injuries including concussion, depression and anxiety. In 2023, J.E. was subsequently hospitalized, diagnosed with and treated for schizophrenia.
In Security National Insurance Co v. Thomas, the insurer paid income replacement benefits to the insured, Aklilu Thomas, following a collision that occurred on June 1, 2018. Partial repayment of benefits was subsequently sought by the insurer and the dispute went to the Licence Appeal Tribunal (the “LAT”).
