In this case, the decision of the Divisional Court stems from the defendants’ appeal on a motion to dismiss their request to remove counsel for the plaintiff. The defendants’ asserted that plaintiff’s counsel was in a conflict of interest or, alternatively, a witness at trial…
Case Summaries Category Archives
Nelson (City) v. Marchi, 2021 SCC 41 (CanLII)
In this case, the Plaintiff was attempting to access a business, but the snowbank created by the city blocked her route to the sidewalk. She decided to cross the snowbank and seriously injured her leg…
Foster v. Aviva Gen. Ins. Co., 2021 CanLII 117413 (ON LAT)
Recently, in the Reconsideration Decision of Foster v. Aviva, Vice-Chair Boyce of the LAT tackled the issue of whether the CRB and CERB are deductible from IRBs…
Podlovics v. Aviva General Insurance, 2021 CanLII 96943 (ON LAT)
This hearing before the Licence Appeal Tribunal dealt primarily with the issue of whether the Applicant’s injuries were predominantly minor within the meaning of the SABS. The Applicant submitted a number of medical and rehabilitation treatment plans above the $3,500.00 available under the MIG for claimants with predominantly minor injuries…
Solanki v. Reilly, 2021 ONSC 6694
In this case, the Ontario Superior Court recently considered whether two Plaintiffs sustained permanent and serious impairments of important physical, mental or psychological functions caused by a motor vehicle accident in accordance with the Insurance Act…
Sabanadze v. Joseph, 2021 ONSC 6744 (CanLII)
In this case, the Plaintiffs are individuals who were injured after a Greyhound bus they were riding in as passengers ploughed into the rear of a tanker truck and became entangled in a multi-vehicle collision on highway 417, in the Province of Ontario, on January 27, 2014. The litigation involved as much as twenty-six (26) defendants at one time.