This decision demonstrates that for catastrophic cases, the LAT has made it clear that properly qualified experts will lose credibility if they do not have sufficient expertise in the areas for which they are providing WPI rating.
Musa v Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 255 et al., 2022 ONSC 1030
In Musa v Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 255 et al., the issue was whether the Defendant contractor applied the road salt to the driveway and parking areas of the condominium in a sufficiently timely way to avoid or mitigate the formation of icy conditions that would put the residents at risk of injury through slipping or falling.
Labrosse v. Jones et al., 2021 ONSC 8031
In this case, the Ontario Superior Court dismissed a summary judgment motion for a novel claim involving a plaintiff who suffered psychological injury upon hearing the aftermath of her daughter’s motor vehicle accident via telephone…
Solanki v. Reilly, 2021 ONSC 6694
In this case, the Ontario Superior Court recently considered whether two Plaintiffs sustained permanent and serious impairments of important physical, mental or psychological functions caused by a motor vehicle accident in accordance with the Insurance Act…
Skoblenick v. Aviva General Insurance Company, 2021 ONSC 5340 (CanLII)
A recent decision that speaks to the conduct of counsel with regard to discoveries…