This case serves as an important reminder of the real (and potentially substantial) costs consequences for Plaintiffs, even when they are covered by adverse costs insurance policies.
Lee v. Castro et al., 2020 ONSC 1257
The decision of Lee v. Castro et al. serves as an important reminder on the strict application of limitation periods, particularly when it comes to the discoverability doctrine.
Syed v. Petrie, 2020 ONSC 664
The decision of Syed v. Petrie, 2020 ONSC 664 serves as an important refresher on the law of admissibility of surveillance at Trial for both Plaintiff and Defence counsel, particularly in relation to the late delivery of such reports.
Brophy v. Harrison, 2019 ONSC 4377
Throughout the course of the litigation, the Defendants did not make any offers to settle. There was not even an offer for a dismissal without costs.
Warlow v. Dr. Sadeghi, [2019] BCSC 463
Warlow v. Dr. Sadeghi is a case where the Plaintiff was unsuccessful at an informed consent trial. The modified objective test was applied.