This decision demonstrates that for catastrophic cases, the LAT has made it clear that properly qualified experts will lose credibility if they do not have sufficient expertise in the areas for which they are providing WPI rating.
The life-altering impact of a mild traumatic brain injury, despite the Plaintiff’s return to work and surveillance evidence at trial showing the Plaintiff carrying on a normal life.
An example of inadmissible hearsay used to corroborate physical evidence or independent witness evidence requirements under an OPCF 44R Family Protection Endorsement.
A discussion about outdated fee structures in the Ontario no-fault system.
Identifying early signs of traumatic brain injury.
A decision has been released by the Licence Appeal Tribunal, further narrowing the definition of an accident…
