ontario Tag Archives

Aditi v. Doe, 2022 ONSC 4049

An example of inadmissible hearsay used to corroborate physical evidence or independent witness evidence requirements under an OPCF 44R Family Protection Endorsement.

Graul v. Kansal, 2022 ONSC 1958

A reminder that expert witnesses retained by both plaintiff and defendant counsel are expected to give evidence in a way that is objectively helpful to the court, and not influenced by which side that retains their services.

The Estate of Diane Tsialtas v Munroe – 2022 ONSC 1207

Reimbursement of legal costs following the Defendants’ failure to mediate at an earlier stage, which unnecessarily lengthened the duration of the proceeding contrary to rule 57.01(1)(e).